Space/Science » in reply to re: The Space Shuttle is a technical and pro-space promotion failure

The whole thread (18 posts)

• Cosmis Log eye-opener. "HOW SAFE IS THE SHUTTLE?" - Bowser - 11/9/2008 8:29:39 PM
  • re: Cosmis Log eye-opener. "HOW SAFE IS THE SHUTTLE?" - gbaikie - 11/9/2008 10:47:04 PM
    • Let's look at the 2 failures - E.P. - 11/10/2008 4:14:21 PM
    • re: Cosmis Log eye-opener. "HOW SAFE IS THE SHUTTLE?" - Marcia - 11/10/2008 1:43:47 AM
      • An unmanned shuttle. (Take a deep breath, let it out, do it again.) - Bowser - 11/10/2008 2:28:21 AM
        • not with the old electronics and wiring - E.P. - 11/10/2008 4:02:24 PM
        • The words "safe" and "shuttle" have never really belonged together - McFly - 11/10/2008 12:42:44 PM
          • In one book, Pre-Challenger failure estimates: NASA engineers, 1-100. NASA management, 1-100,000. - Bowser - 11/10/2008 3:38:26 PM
            • Thank you...and nice find, btw! :-) (n/t) - McFly - 11/10/2008 6:12:48 PM
            • The Space Shuttle is a technical and pro-space promotion failure - Socrates II - 11/10/2008 4:09:41 PM
              • re: The Space Shuttle is a technical and pro-space promotion failure - Marcia - 11/10/2008 10:01:47 PM
                • re: I should have said, NOT SO, as a failure is concerned. - Marcia - 11/10/2008 10:04:07 PM
                  • While I cannot comment on your grandfather... - Socrates II - 11/11/2008 2:01:37 PM
              • Some points - Raoul - 11/10/2008 9:16:40 PM
                • When lofting larger than otherwise numbers of people into space gets us a permanent place on the planetoids and other worlds - Socrates II - 11/10/2008 10:48:02 PM
              • Yes, but... - E.P. - 11/10/2008 4:24:04 PM
        • re: An unmanned shuttle. (Take a deep breath, let it out, do it again.) - Marcia - 11/10/2008 2:36:28 AM
          • re: Last note: - Marcia - 11/10/2008 4:05:38 PM