Flame » in reply to I'm talking about a set of ideas. "z" is talking about a specific person.

The whole thread (26 posts)

• Denying nothing, "Palin calls critics among McCain aides 'jerks'." - Bowser - 11/9/2008 8:50:53 PM
  • Republican civil war looms... - z - 11/10/2008 10:58:43 PM
    • Perhaps it's exactly what they need - McFly - 11/11/2008 2:52:03 PM
      • "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice." (n/t) - ER - 11/11/2008 7:06:45 PM
        • And what is that extremism worth? - z - 11/11/2008 10:45:19 PM
          • Cool! Now try these: - TB - 11/11/2008 10:51:28 PM
            • Well unless Nancy has another of her crazy seances, we ain't hearin' from the Gipper no more! (n/t) - z - 11/11/2008 11:08:07 PM
              • I didn't think you'd get it. (n/t) - TB - 11/12/2008 12:24:55 AM
                • Nobody seems to be getting "it" anymore Tom - azstrummer - 11/12/2008 8:45:42 PM
                • You are so clever lately, I have a hard time following you. - alcaray - 11/12/2008 1:55:56 AM
                  • I'm talking about a set of ideas. "z" is talking about a specific person. - TB - 11/12/2008 4:03:55 AM
                    • "set of ideas" - you mean like the thoroughly discredited supply-side economics? (n/t) - z - 11/12/2008 5:11:39 PM
                      • As opposed to the sterling record of centrally-planned economies? - TB - 11/13/2008 12:23:08 AM
                        • Wrong. - ER - 11/13/2008 2:53:35 AM
                          • Abstract principles - TB - 11/13/2008 5:24:28 AM
                            • re: Abstract principles - ER - 11/13/2008 12:24:47 PM
                              • Whoa, hold on... - TB - 11/13/2008 5:48:10 PM
                                • By definition, there is no such thing as a rational or objective principle. - ER - 11/13/2008 10:17:13 PM
                                  • re: By definition? Okay. (n/t) - TB - 11/14/2008 12:11:42 AM
        • Yeabut... - alcaray - 11/11/2008 10:25:57 PM
          • But yeah - ER - 11/12/2008 12:00:23 AM
    • The answer is fairly obvious when you look at past elections. (n/t) - TB - 11/11/2008 3:38:35 AM
      • Unfortunately for Republicans subsequent elections will be held in the future not the past - z - 11/11/2008 10:38:03 PM
        • This just in: GOP underwrites development of Flux Capacitor ;-) (n/t) - McFly - 11/12/2008 12:03:37 AM
  • Link please (n/t) - Lindy - 11/9/2008 9:41:39 PM
    • Ah, the link! - Bowser - 11/9/2008 10:18:26 PM