Unfortunately for Republicans subsequent elections will be held in the future not the past

Flame » in reply to The answer is fairly obvious when you look at past elections.

z — 11/11/2008 10:38:03 PM (archived)

And the future isâ€¦well, just check out whatâ€™s happening in the last columnâ€¦

The simple fact of the matter is that traditional Republican conservativism is not finding much support at all in the diverse demographics of todayâ€™s â€“ and tomorrowâ€™s â€“ America.

Republicans can go ahead and follow Sarah Palin and Rush Limbaugh into oblivion if they wish, but theyâ€™d be a hell of a lot smarter to woo back moderates like Colin Powellâ€¦

The whole thread (26 posts)

Denying nothing, "Palin calls critics among McCain aides 'jerks'." - Bowser - 11/9/2008 8:50:53 PM
- Republican civil war looms... - z - 11/10/2008 10:58:43 PM
  - Perhaps it's exactly what they need - McFly - 11/11/2008 2:52:03 PM
    - "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice." (n/t) - ER - 11/11/2008 7:06:45 PM
      - And what is that extremism worth? - z - 11/11/2008 10:45:19 PM
        
        Cool! Now try these: - TB - 11/11/2008 10:51:28 PM
        
        Well unless Nancy has another of her crazy seances, we ain't hearin' from the Gipper no more! (n/t) - z - 11/11/2008 11:08:07 PM
        
        I didn't think you'd get it. (n/t) - TB - 11/12/2008 12:24:55 AM
        
        Nobody seems to be getting "it" anymore Tom - azstrummer - 11/12/2008 8:45:42 PM
        
        You are so clever lately, I have a hard time following you. - alcaray - 11/12/2008 1:55:56 AM
        
        I'm talking about a set of ideas. "z" is talking about a specific person. - TB - 11/12/2008 4:03:55 AM
        
        "set of ideas" - you mean like the thoroughly discredited supply-side economics? (n/t) - z - 11/12/2008 5:11:39 PM
        
        As opposed to the sterling record of centrally-planned economies? - TB - 11/13/2008 12:23:08 AM
        
        Wrong. - ER - 11/13/2008 2:53:35 AM
        
        Abstract principles - TB - 11/13/2008 5:24:28 AM
        
        re: Abstract principles - ER - 11/13/2008 12:24:47 PM
        
        Whoa, hold on... - TB - 11/13/2008 5:48:10 PM
        
        By definition, there is no such thing as a rational or objective principle. - ER - 11/13/2008 10:17:13 PM
        
        re: By definition? Okay. (n/t) - TB - 11/14/2008 12:11:42 AM
      - Yeabut... - alcaray - 11/11/2008 10:25:57 PM
        
        But yeah - ER - 11/12/2008 12:00:23 AM
  - The answer is fairly obvious when you look at past elections. (n/t) - TB - 11/11/2008 3:38:35 AM
    - Unfortunately for Republicans subsequent elections will be held in the future not the past - z - 11/11/2008 10:38:03 PM
      - This just in: GOP underwrites development of Flux Capacitor ;-) (n/t) - McFly - 11/12/2008 12:03:37 AM
- Link please (n/t) - Lindy - 11/9/2008 9:41:39 PM
  - Ah, the link! - Bowser - 11/9/2008 10:18:26 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (26 posts)