If, and only ifm the intelligence is good and there is no "collateral damage" this is the way to go.
I say "no collateral damage" because the military under Bush can't be trusted to minimize it, or even verify an enemies presence before blowing away innocent people. And killing innocent people is what terrorists do. The definition of terrorism. Bush has caused more problems than he has solved through his carelessness.
However, in the hands of a responsible CINC this would be the way to go.
WASHINGTON: "The United States military since 2004 has used broad, secret authority to carry out nearly a dozen previously undisclosed attacks against Al Qaeda and other militants in Syria, Pakistan and elsewhere, according to senior American officials."
Arf
"Secret order lets U.S. raid al Qaeda around the world."
The whole thread (10 posts)
- "Secret order lets U.S. raid al Qaeda around the world."
- re: Bush's failed policies
- Yes, under Obama, there will no longer be collateral damage in military attacks.
