Current Events » in reply to re: WHAT article?

The whole thread (24 posts)

• That's interesting. - et - 2/17/2009 6:25:43 PM
  • image? - et - 2/17/2009 6:27:19 PM
    • What do you think that proves? - TB - 2/17/2009 7:21:41 PM
      • Jeepers, did you even read the article? (n/t) - et - 2/17/2009 8:49:00 PM
        • WHAT article? - nick hoffman - 2/17/2009 9:22:09 PM
          • re: WHAT article? - et - 2/18/2009 2:36:36 AM
            • First one should read "(bracket)img(space-space)src". - et - 2/18/2009 5:43:42 PM
          • Double left click on the little icon in the upper left corner. - Bowser - 2/17/2009 9:33:19 PM
            • Thanks uber-Hitler. j/k (n/t) - et - 2/18/2009 2:38:09 AM
        • Yes, I did. - TB - 2/17/2009 9:21:13 PM
          • GOP Congress - Buck Galaxy - 2/17/2009 9:31:35 PM
            • re: GOP Congress - TB - 2/17/2009 10:03:40 PM
              • GOP Congress - Buck Galaxy - 2/17/2009 10:44:41 PM
                • re: GOP Congress - TB - 2/17/2009 10:55:38 PM
                  • And you HONESTLY think the GOP would have done things differently - Buck Galaxy - 2/17/2009 11:05:17 PM
                    • "Nearly every economist" - TB - 2/18/2009 12:59:34 AM
                      • Nearly every economist that's been right - azstrummer - 2/18/2009 2:22:16 PM
                      • If your livelihood depended on the housing industry you might have a different opinion on the Dem's expediancy. (n/t) - RobVG - 2/18/2009 2:11:51 AM
                        • Expediency - TB - 2/18/2009 5:13:59 AM
                          • 1944 - Jody - 2/18/2009 2:20:30 PM
                          • Yeah let's do nothing except cut taxes for the rich right? - Buck Galaxy - 2/18/2009 7:30:05 AM
                            • re: right? - TB - 2/18/2009 4:59:51 PM
                              • I'm talking about what the GOP has done for the last 8 years - Buck Galaxy - 2/18/2009 8:30:13 PM
                            • If it’s getting worse by the day - SteveS - 2/18/2009 3:00:04 PM