Scientists Sometimes Need to Think Like Science Fiction Writers
By Mike Brotherton
March 14, 2009
Not every scientist has an interest in science fiction or anything resembling the ability to think like a science fiction writer.
I was reminded of this again today in regard to this story about how to focus SETI searches.
Basically, the idea is that it is easier in principle to find and characterize Earth-like planets when you can see them eclipsing their system’s star. Therefore if we want to talk with ETIs, we should be targeting our searches in the plane of the ecliptic. “Plane of the ecliptic†is just a technical term for the directions in space that would see us eclipsing the Sun. The aliens living in star systems in the plane of the ecliptic, so the reasoning goes, would then be the ones most likely to have spotted us and be trying to communicate with us.
Maybe a teeny-tiny bit more likely, but overall a dumb reason to restrict searches in my opinion. (Somehow the article I linked to talks about using the idea to “broaden†searches, but that’s just bad reasoning or writing, in my opinion. The only way to use the idea is to restrict searches.) Let me explain why I think the idea isn’t very good or logical, setting aside my scientist cap for my science fiction writer cap.
Full article here:
http://www.mikebrotherton.com/?p=1060
Space/Science » in reply to Too many comets = no life?
Scientists Sometimes Need to Think Like Science Fiction Writers
The whole thread (25 posts)
- How to narrow the search for ETI
- Look at it in reverse. Figure out what we would need to do to TRANSMIT a signal to another life form.
- The best way to search for ETI
- That's logical...
- re: How to narrow the search for ETI
- The only problem is...
- Did you see the Benfords' papers?
- "Alien" life might be right here on Earth now
