Even small raptors had long tails that they used for balance. T.Rex had an enormous tail.
I would make sense that as the longer, heavier tail evolved, the center of gravity would move backward, eventually reducing the locomotive effectiveness of the forelegs, which would become smaller as the tail became larger. While lizards are not dinos, we can observe how some lizards have evolved to run on their back legs, which could be seen as an early stage of how the dinos evolved.
To test this model I'd have to review raptor evolution to see how the front leg / tail size ratio changed over time.
So, T. Rex had small forelimbs because he had a big tail. This served T.Rex because it could run better without big forelimbs.
Space/Science » in reply to Why does T. Rex have vestigial forelegs?
My hypothesis
The whole thread (27 posts)
- Why does T. Rex have vestigial forelegs?
- Any chance it's a mistake?
- They can still manipulate things.
- Grooming
- My hypothesis
- re: Why does T. Rex have vestigial forelegs?
- To hold their pants up.
- re: Why does T. Rex have vestigial forelegs?
- I am afraid, gentlemen, that none of thes ideas holds up,
- One Idea: The were simply left-over evolutionary garbage, like nipples on male mammals. (n/t)
- Mutation
- the accepted story
- Digging nests? Manipulating eggs, young? (n/t)
- re: Why does T. Rex have vestigial forelegs?
