The only reason you don't notice it is because for you, it's the 'norm'.
Look at the recent cases in which an 8-1 male court showed a complete disregard for acts of discrimination against women in the workplace. Do you really think a more balanced court would have been so insensitive, or perhaps more generously described as simply well intentioned but unaware, of the daily challenges female workers face?
It's perfectly natural to expect that justices, of whatever gender or race or ethnicity, would bring to the court a perspective and a wisdom gained through decades of their own personal life experiences, rooted in their own culture.
It's also perfectly natural to expect that a country as diverse as ours would have a Supreme Court that is also diverse in its make-up, not just a bunch of old white males.
Current Events » in reply to Lecture given by Sotomayor
Good grief - white, male, anglo SC justices have been practicing 'racial and gender identity politics' for 200 years
The whole thread (15 posts)
- Republicans are outraged as white, male representation on Supreme Court set to plunge below 67%
- Did he have the same issues with Judge Thomas?
- Anyone else see anything wrong with this article.
- Lecture given by Sotomayor
- re: Republicans are outraged as white, male representation on Supreme Court set to plunge below 67%
