The best resoultion possible, for every type of reradiated particle.

What is needed is differentaion of asteroid impacts by classes and comet impact. Observations of the residuals from geologically "recent" impact events should be obtainable.

Another problem is then re-examining in detail the impact mechanics of the Earth-Moon system.

None of this work has been done, or funded, another reasson for Weiler and Morrison's relief, aside from their roles in Girffin's contempt for the Congress's instructions for detection systems.

The new NASA IG's report on Griiffin's failure to respond to the instructions of the George Brown Jr. Amendment should be along shortly, an all source report including all correspondence and meetings.

By the way, if you have not read my book "Man and Impact in the Americas" yet, it would probably be a good ided for you to do so before pretending to have any knowledge of the impact hazard.

I also don't know if you've done it yet, but I would appreciate it if you would remove your remarks on my attitude towards manned Mars flight.
I am not opposed, it is just not a high priority for me now, and I do not think that Zubrin's architecture is very good. If that makes me a "troll" in your view, then may I suggest to you that your view needs adjustment?

In sum, I do not hate you Doug, but rather have enjoyed the reprocessed planetary images on your site. As matter of fact, it is a shame that NASA never funded professional reprocesssing, in my view.