Space/Science » in reply to You're ring definition is too narrow and incorrect.

The whole thread (16 posts)

• A trick question: How many ringed planets are there in our Solar System? (n/t) - Jefferson-Washington - 7/9/2009 9:16:38 PM
  • Neptune, Uranus, Saturn and Jupiter ! (n/t) - Raoul - 7/9/2009 9:22:01 PM
    • Wrong! Five, counting Earth. - Jefferson-Washington - 7/9/2009 9:45:43 PM
      • Not wrong - Nick Hoffman - 7/9/2009 11:31:40 PM
        • You're too arbitrary. - Jefferson-Washington - 7/10/2009 9:14:21 PM
          • A ring must at least look like one to be called that way - Raoul - 7/11/2009 3:29:52 PM
        • re: Not wrong - Doug Ellison - 7/10/2009 11:13:04 AM
          • You're ring definition is too narrow and incorrect. (n/t) - Jefferson-Washington - 7/10/2009 9:10:56 PM
            • The clue is RING - Doug Ellison - 7/10/2009 9:23:52 PM
              • You need a paradigm shift in your thinking, friend. - Jefferson-Washington - 7/10/2009 9:34:10 PM
          • Some day Earth will have a real debris ring - Socrates II - 7/10/2009 12:52:48 PM
            • I wonder how many more artificial toroidal rings there are around other planets light-years away? (n/t) - Jefferson-Washington - 7/10/2009 9:42:20 PM
        • Yep, you really appreciate when your ship gets hit by a barely visible piece of junk. (n/t) - Eri - 7/10/2009 3:54:51 AM
          • Speaking of the ringed planet Neptune - Socrates II - 7/10/2009 11:46:25 AM
            • Did the Vatican help suppress Galileo's discovery of Neptune? - Socrates II - 7/10/2009 3:25:22 PM
              • Earlier reference papers - Socrates II - 7/10/2009 4:30:16 PM