Mark, you have a problem in perception

Space/Science » in reply to What Arguement?

E.P. — 7/24/2009 4:28:35 PM (archived)

The same as was seen in your comments on Dordain's mention of CAPS.

I will just state here that your estimate of current risk is off by several orders of magnitude.

There's a problem here. In engineering terms, it's not the process, it's the measurement device.

The whole thread (18 posts)

New Evidence for Clovis Era Comet Strikes in North America - phil - 7/22/2009 8:34:58 PM
- You would think that some people would get the message - E.P. - 7/22/2009 9:49:32 PM
  - Scepticism and science - Adam - 7/22/2009 11:00:13 PM
    - re: Scepticism and science - E.P. - 7/24/2009 4:25:31 PM
    - re: Scepticism and science - phil - 7/23/2009 1:04:49 AM
      - The debate is over geological evidence for comet impacts on Earth - mip - 7/23/2009 11:32:19 PM
        
        5. There is ample evidence that they are very rare - Nick Hoffman - 7/24/2009 1:09:37 AM
        
        no there is not - E.P. - 7/24/2009 4:21:37 PM
        
        Rare or not, it would only take one - mip - 7/24/2009 2:27:12 AM
        
        Statistics vs expectation in the matter of risk - Nick Hoffman - 7/24/2009 6:08:33 AM
        
        Statistics Matter - Marsby - 7/24/2009 3:01:17 AM
        
        Statistics Matter: Yes they do, and right now NASA is understating the risk by an order of magnitude (n/t) - E.P. - 7/25/2009 3:41:53 PM
        
        Risk Analysis vs. Game Ender - mip - 7/24/2009 3:26:44 AM
        
        What Arguement? - Marsby - 7/24/2009 1:51:27 PM
        
        Mark, you have a problem in perception - E.P. - 7/24/2009 4:28:35 PM
        
        Probably So - Marsby - 7/24/2009 5:34:13 PM
        
        But what if there's only a one-in-a-million chance... - alcaray - 7/24/2009 8:06:39 AM
        
        re: But what if there's only a one-in-a-million chance... - Doug Ellison - 7/24/2009 1:37:26 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (18 posts)