Geez, Tom. First you accuse Democrats of being Socialists, very nearly communists, and now you're going to kick in the teeth of folks who might disagree with you on Iraqi kids.

I know some Democrats who at one time would have done serious bodily damage to someone who hinted they might be communist. They happened to be off enduring some extreme discomfort ostensibly fighting communism, and they were Democrats. Voting, very liberal, some of 'em even Black. Would have resented your implication.

And, regarding Iraq.

I was thinking. Our President has taken after Saddam, accusing him of using WMD (by the way, which country sprayed Agent Orange on people, including it's own people?), and told him he is going to be attacked.

What would you do with your WMD, if you had them? Would you hide them? In hardened bunkers. Or would you ship them off to other countries?

Would you send some of those things off to the country which was going to attack? Might hide them, set to go off on a signal, or if they don't get a signal?

Gotta wonder why GWB has been saber-rattling if he really wanted to "get" Saddam without serious casualties to Americans. Because if he wanted to see a lot of Americans get hurt in the process, he'd do what he's done.

Announce it, tell 'em, warn 'em, holler, smirk, warn 'em some more, smirk again, and then talk some more.

Does he think Saddam is just sitting there? While GWB is concerned with ABMs, how safe are the US borders? Who does he think will pay the price for this blustering?

Arf