Okay, assuming I'm understanding you right, and that "one party rule" is the moral issue here, try to find me a single Democratic politician who would consider it "immoral" for their party to rule all three branches of government.
Or to make it more personal, do YOU think Democrats running all the branches of government would be a bad idea? Why or why not? If they did take over the whole thing, what would you do to change the situation? If anything?
Wasserman, who is considerably farther to the Left than most Democrats, is only upset because HE doesn't have the absolute power to impose his particular socialist fantasies on the nation.
Maybe I'm a little more worried about a power monopoly on the part of the Marxist Left, which has a proven record of annihilating every nation that has fallen under its complete control. Why Marxists continue to hold onto their bizarre dream of happy enslavement is a mystery. It's like insisting on going to a doctor that has killed every one of his patients to date.
Off Topic » in reply to Re: Democrats against one-party rule. Yeah, right.
Re: Democrats against one-party rule.
