You think that's bad, check out Worldnet Daily. The current issue is relatively mild. They tend to really head off the pier on New World Order crap, but sometimes scoop out stories no one else has found yet.

I won't argue that some of these sites require a very active BS filter, but then what site doesn't? Heck, just because the New York Times is more subtle about it, doesn't mean you don't need a BS filter just as much.

The facts are still the facts, however biased the presentation. If you have an argument with a fact as presented, lay it on us. We'll listen. We get the real truth when ALL of us are applying our separate BS filters together.

When I catch a story in Newsmax, I try to go back to the original source when I can. Sometimes it isn't feasible.