I asked "WHY did we go into Iraq again?' and you answered "Yes because he wants nukes........ by taking out a regime hellbent on procuring them, we still alleviate the threat."

Let's look at that reasoning of yours. You see, I can tell you're trying to educate me here.
Sadam wants nukes. Yeah, along with all kinds of other countries. He's surrounded by countries who has them. Of course, the inspections and sanctions have slowed him down quite a bit. But the threat is still there. The THREAT.
Forget Bin Laden. Forget the Saudis. Forget Al Queda.........Sadam is now the Anti-Christ!
Oh my dear, he just ONE of many muslim radicals we have to fear.
Just one. And if there WERE another hundred, today I guarantee there are a thousand.
By the time this war is "over", we could get into the thousands....

>It gets darkest before the dawn. Yes first things will appear worse and then they will get good - and pretty fast.

I love how you imagine the best! And I imagine the worst!
Me, I'm with the "worst case scenario" crowd.
You, you're with the unrealistic cowboy crowd. Bet you have your red bandana and pistols on!

>"However, Iraqis will receive a healthy dose of democracy and freedom unprecedented after the nation is stabilized."

After?? My God, it's going to cost a FORTUNE because they're going to have to bomb Bagdad back to the stone age, to get ride of the resistance! Iraqis will get a healthy dose of lead and land mines, misery and death. There won't be many left to "liberate".

Arf.