Re: further clarification

Space/Science » in reply to Re: further clarification

gbaikie — 12/26/2001 2:10:19 PM (archived)

Oh, right. TPF has a lot of precusors:
http://tpf.jpl.nasa.gov/technology/technology.html
And didn't even see any mention of when it was going to be deployed- seems like at least after NGST or SIRTF.
So seems reasonable it wouldn't be built until at least after 2006.

The whole thread (21 posts)

Why the TPF Mission May Never Fly - phil - 12/23/2001 3:47:04 PM
- Missed the point I was making - phil - 12/24/2001 3:33:31 PM
  - Point taken, Phil. Depends on technology.. - Marcia - 12/26/2001 5:46:29 PM
  - Clear To Me - Mark Eby - 12/25/2001 5:52:17 PM
  - Re: yet... - Raoul Lannoy - 12/24/2001 4:41:49 PM
    - once more into the breach... - phil - 12/25/2001 12:15:21 PM
      - Re: once more into the breach... - Marcia - 12/26/2001 10:17:35 AM
        
        Re: once more into the breach... - phil - 12/26/2001 10:46:28 AM
        
        Re: once more into the breach... - tony - 1/31/2002 6:02:40 PM
- Re: Why the TPF Mission May Never Fly - gbaikie - 12/24/2001 10:31:49 AM
  - "Why would you suppose such a small percentage?" - alcaray - 12/26/2001 7:39:10 PM
    - Bias vs Bigotry - Mark Eby - 12/28/2001 3:56:49 PM
    - further clarification - phil - 12/26/2001 9:57:38 AM
      - Re: further clarification - gbaikie - 12/26/2001 10:38:03 AM
        
        Re: further clarification - phil - 12/26/2001 10:42:39 AM
        
        Re: further clarification - gbaikie - 12/26/2001 2:10:19 PM
        
        Re: further clarification - phil - 12/27/2001 1:13:24 PM
      - I got you the first times. - alcaray - 12/26/2001 10:20:30 AM
- TPF and Kepler are both great ideas - Gary - 12/23/2001 7:48:08 PM
  - Re: TPF and Kepler are both great ideas - Success_Machine - 12/27/2001 9:01:47 AM
- Re: Why the TPF Mission May Never Fly - Raoul - 12/23/2001 5:38:04 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (21 posts)