Re: Annual Blips

Space/Science » in reply to Re: Here is another possibility

Re: Annual Blips

Success_Machine — 1/8/2002 6:40:10 PM (archived)

This might be a fundamentally believable reason why we may be detecting blips rather than continuous transmissions - they don't know our planet's exact location either !!!

Come to think of it, considering the distances, they might not be too concerned about annual communications since they are lightyears distant anyways.

The whole thread (17 posts)

We are alone in the universe - Success_Machine - 1/8/2002 5:08:42 PM
- SETI misunderstandings - phil - 1/9/2002 3:52:25 PM
  - Beams don't need to be aimed at us. - Mark Eby - 1/10/2002 3:40:03 PM
    - Re: Beams don't need to be aimed at us. - phil - 1/10/2002 4:53:55 PM
      - Again - Mark Eby - 1/10/2002 8:03:43 PM
        
        Re: Again - phil - 1/11/2002 7:58:47 PM
- A beamed transmission implies a deliberate attempt to communicate - Larry J - 1/9/2002 3:16:20 PM
  - Not necessarily - Robt Clements - 1/10/2002 1:48:56 PM
    - Mote in God's Eye - Nick Hoffman - 1/11/2002 2:48:38 PM
- Your logic is flawless - Gary - 1/8/2002 7:49:21 PM
- Re: We are alone in the universe? - Tom Brosz - 1/8/2002 6:16:50 PM
  - Re: We are alone in the universe? - Marcia - 1/10/2002 1:14:14 PM
  - But if they were that smart - Lee - 1/9/2002 8:55:29 PM
    - That assumes they're trying to communicate with us - Larry J - 1/9/2002 2:24:41 PM
  - Re: Here is another possibility - Success_Machine - 1/8/2002 6:27:44 PM
    - Re: Annual Blips - Success_Machine - 1/8/2002 6:40:10 PM
      - Re: Annual Blips - Success_Machine - 1/8/2002 6:49:29 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (17 posts)