Space/Science » in reply to uhhhh

The whole thread (18 posts)

• Newt on nanotek, NASA Ames, etc. - p - 3/18/2002 3:13:55 PM
  • Re: Such a big man to back such a little thing . . . - D. Spires - 3/18/2002 7:42:55 PM
    • Re: Such a big man to back such a little thing . . . - p - 3/18/2002 9:17:46 AM
      • An idea of mine for a nano weapon - Lee - 3/19/2002 8:43:32 PM
        • Re: What if . . . - D. Spires - 3/19/2002 1:18:32 PM
          • And I thought static electricity was bad! (n/t) - Lee - 3/19/2002 4:20:18 PM
            • Re: Ethnic cleansing taken to the next level . . . - D. Spires - 3/19/2002 4:45:49 PM
              • every party has a party... - p - 3/19/2002 5:33:28 PM
                • The programming issue is nearly as hard as that - Lee - 3/19/2002 8:53:28 PM
                  • I meant isn't (n/t) - Lee - 3/19/2002 8:55:26 PM
                • Re: That's an assembler . . . - D. Spires - 3/19/2002 9:11:11 AM
  • "I think you ought to, at a minimum, triple the education budget. " - alcaray - 3/18/2002 7:28:24 PM
    • Re: - p - 3/18/2002 9:21:17 AM
      • I agree the man is bright! He seems brighter when he doesn't play the politician role.n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 3/18/2002 9:46:05 AM
  • This is fun! - Bowser - 3/18/2002 6:15:19 PM
  • uhhhh - E.P. Grondine - 3/18/2002 4:49:05 PM
    • por vous - Newt - 3/18/2002 5:00:41 PM
      • facile... (p/t) - E.P. Grondine - 3/18/2002 5:16:22 PM