"I wasn't accusing you of prejudice. You seemed to consider the new claim with mild skepticism as warranted for any new theory despite your dislike of GW theories."

Right, though you were accusing me. Whereas in my post I wrote nothing, but merely quoted something I thought was interesting. And gave the link to where there was "the whole story".
Oh, did write that the gentle reader should also check the story on Watson.
The only thing I implied was that I thought this source was a valid source- something worth reading.

Now, maybe Mark, you would think it was "better" if I had tried to quibble with the points of the article. I did consider doing this (hope that makes you happy), but I decided I didn't know enough "about it" to do so.
But generally, in broad terms I do think there is considerable merit to the point of the article and look forward to counter arguments by those that have more knowledge (than myself) in this area.