My response was due to the title. Debunking implies a clear dismissal. Such a title does indeed indicate prejudice against global warming and a desire to see it dismissed based on whatever counters can be found when it is used in conjunction with such an inconclusive counter argument. You chose to copy the title from the decidedly anti-GW CCNet. If you felt differently a different title would have been appropriate.

It amazes me how much Peiser is willing to base impact estimates on myth and legends while disdaining computer models as a valid basis for scientific conclusions. As a grad school modeler myself and a working engineer who has found commercial computer models very useful, I find that attitude most unscientific.

Regards,
Mark