Barber and Scott paper in PNAS

Space/Science » in reply to Resolution of a Big Argument About Tiny Magnetic Minerals in Martian Meteorite

Alex R. Blackwell — 5/13/2002 2:21:40 PM (archived)

I believe the paper on which this PSRD article is based will appear in tomorrow's issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS):

Barber, D. J. and Scott, E. R. D. (2002) Origin of supposedly biogenic magnetite in the Martian meteorite Allan Hills 84001. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99, 6556-6561.

Alex R. Blackwell
University of Hawaii

The whole thread (11 posts)

Resolution of a Big Argument About Tiny Magnetic Minerals in Martian Meteorite - Alex R. Blackwell - 5/13/2002 1:47:01 PM
- Re: Resolution of a Big Argument About Tiny Magnetic Minerals in Martian Meteorite - Robert Clark - 5/15/2002 2:36:49 PM
- Big argument. - Bowser - 5/14/2002 5:14:27 PM
  - You dont understand how it works, just like the press didnt understand... - R.L. - 5/14/2002 3:48:16 PM
    - They've yet to be proven wrong. - Lee - 5/15/2002 7:36:30 PM
      - Re: They've yet to be proven wrong. - Nick Hoffman - 5/15/2002 2:03:47 PM
        
        And "dinosaur bones" aren't really bones. - Lee - 5/15/2002 8:39:52 AM
    - Au contraire... - Nick Hoffman - 5/15/2002 2:00:22 PM
      - Re: Au contraire... - Robert Clark - 5/15/2002 2:47:31 PM
- Which lends credibility to the cold, dry Mars idea. - ebnelson - 5/14/2002 3:43:53 PM
- Barber and Scott paper in PNAS - Alex R. Blackwell - 5/13/2002 2:21:40 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (11 posts)