115% on Moon? Yes!
<I think NASA should fund everything above with above a 2% response with a few more select missions at about those relative weights
As an advocate of a return to the Moon, that sounds great to me! Since 1972 (last year of Apollo) NASA has paid for exactly 1 lunar mission, and has spent at least 50 times as much on Mars missions? There's a lot we still don't know about the Moon - Mars has been mapped at many times greater resolution for example, even though it's so much farther away! If NASA devoted just 30% of what it spends on new Mars missions to new missions to the Moon, that would be a HUGE improvement over the past 30 years...