That's quite an image, Nick, and a pretty compelling paper about it. You really had me going, saving the punchline about low latitudes for the very last sentence.
Predictably, I had to take a look for myself in the raw data....
(Click to display 100% version in another window; 417K)
The 100% version is worth downloading, and it's worth looking at at 200%. Where your "constrasty" version has abundant areas that appear motion-blurred, I must confess that in my version I'm hard-pressed to see anything that's unambiguously motion-blurred--fluid "caught in the act". Instead, I think I'm seeing light material peeking through a dark surface layer. What really cast some doubt in my mind was spotting several sharp channels right-of-center that cut across light areas which are blurred in the original.
What am I missing?
--Robert
Space/Science » in reply to Near Polar Gullies
M0906352
The whole thread (24 posts)
- More from Mars' South Polar Region
- Near Polar Gullies
- M0906352
- Re: Near Polar Gullies
- Re: Near Polar Gullies
- Re: Feh!
- Near Polar Gullies
