Whenever I see a cosmologist that ignores relativity - I see a cosmologist who hasn't a clue to what he is talking about.
I would agreewith that, yet I see intelligent people using 'words' that they do not undersand.

S -Energy in motion is ageless.
J -I would say that Energy IS motion and ageless

S -The universe is energy.
J - I would say that The universe is full of energy.

S -Energy has always existed.
J -At least from the time that 'fundamental mass' (fm) started moving.

S -Energy cannot be created or destroyed but simply changes form.
J -True.

S -If one simply must put an infantile beginning and ending vision upon the material universe we observe - then the best way to envision it is that it is ending right now....and beginning right now.
J -In the atomic scale, yes.

S -Lee is close to right in his assumption of the repetition - however to bve really accurate we must realize it is OSCILLATING.
J -Pulsating, oscillating, repeating.

S -Energy oscillates - each atom is an oscillating energy expression, dying and beginning again countless times in a nanosecond.
J -Oscillation is motion, motion is energy.
If something is 'moving' it must have 'SPACE' to move in.

S -So the universe is constantly dying - and giving birth to itself!
J -Very rapidly in the atomic scale and very slowly in the scale of the universe.

See the "zero point or effect" post below

Cheers: ;-)