Re: NASA Not to print book to confirm MOON LANDINGS......

Space/Science » in reply to NASA to print book to confirm MOON LANDINGS......

Chris Vancil — 11/8/2002 11:02:34 AM (archived)

Guess again bad PR and the deal is off. But Jim says he will write it anyway. I would buy a few copies and send them to the Hoaxers. Like the twit Buzz popped in the jaw.

--Chris Vancil

The whole thread (14 posts)

NASA to print book to confirm MOON LANDINGS...... - Carl........ - 11/6/2002 7:13:49 PM
- Re: NASA Not to print book to confirm MOON LANDINGS...... - Chris Vancil - 11/8/2002 11:02:34 AM
- I guess not too many peeps on this board have taken the time to understand Cholesterol Metabolism.Is the knowledge of Vitamin D Metabolism a hoax ? n/t - sunblok - 11/7/2002 6:08:51 PM
  - No, *you're* a hoax, nitwit! (n/t) - sunblockblock - 11/7/2002 6:28:32 PM
    - Hehe... must be a Democrat with no unit measure or maybe no scruples! n/t - €sunblok€ - 11/7/2002 7:10:28 PM
      - Up front and in your face Nathan, the ancient meanings of ocul-aris, P-aris, F-erris, and arris are? All the words to Imagine. - sunblok - 11/7/2002 12:14:21 PM
- Re: NASA to print book to confirm MOON LANDINGS...... - Jack Herer - 11/7/2002 5:59:56 PM
  - Re: No, they weren't . . . (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 11/7/2002 8:40:14 PM
- I have shaken the hands of men who went to the moon. - ebnelson - 11/7/2002 3:21:46 PM
  - I don't think it's about evidence... - McFly - 11/7/2002 4:49:42 PM
  - Re: I have shaken the hands of a man who went to the moon. - Raoul Lannoy - 11/7/2002 3:51:13 PM
- Re: NASA to print book to confirm MOON LANDINGS...... - Robert E. B. - 11/6/2002 8:17:37 PM
  - NASA to print book ... - robert_d - 11/6/2002 10:16:06 AM
- Re: 'how much evidence do they need?' - D. Spires - 11/6/2002 10:18:38 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (14 posts)