How about launching them to the moon so they could argue it all out at Tranquility Base -- while we decide whether or not to allow them a return flight?
I don’t really blame the kids, since they weren’t there to live through it all. It’s the “knowledgeable” idiots who were there, refuse the hard, physical proof, and spout rhetorical pseudo-science reasons why every scientific achievement known to mankind is impossible -- including the existence of NASA -- without the aid of ET.
No amount of evidence will sway the squeaky 1% of Earth's technological wheel. I say just ignore the knut-cases -- or better, play with their microscopic little brains. Some folks just go through their whole lives like it’s another bad B-movie (i.e., Wood’s infamous “Plan 9 From Outer Space”).
Dan
Space/Science » in reply to NASA to print book to confirm MOON LANDINGS......
Re: 'how much evidence do they need?'
The whole thread (14 posts)
- NASA to print book to confirm MOON LANDINGS......
- Re: NASA Not to print book to confirm MOON LANDINGS......
- I guess not too many peeps on this board have taken the time to understand Cholesterol Metabolism.Is the knowledge of Vitamin D Metabolism a hoax ? n/t
- Re: NASA to print book to confirm MOON LANDINGS......
- I have shaken the hands of men who went to the moon.
- Re: NASA to print book to confirm MOON LANDINGS......
- Re: 'how much evidence do they need?'
