Re: NASA to print book to confirm MOON LANDINGS......

Space/Science » in reply to NASA to print book to confirm MOON LANDINGS......

Robert E. B. — 11/6/2002 8:17:37 PM (archived)

These hoaxernuts seem to forget (or maybe they never knew) that people were tracking the Apollo’s on the way to the Moon with their telescopes. The USSR was also watching closely. They would have cried foul really quick had we not gone.

Plus there is tons of other evidence.

The whole thread (14 posts)

NASA to print book to confirm MOON LANDINGS...... - Carl........ - 11/6/2002 7:13:49 PM
- Re: NASA Not to print book to confirm MOON LANDINGS...... - Chris Vancil - 11/8/2002 11:02:34 AM
- I guess not too many peeps on this board have taken the time to understand Cholesterol Metabolism.Is the knowledge of Vitamin D Metabolism a hoax ? n/t - sunblok - 11/7/2002 6:08:51 PM
  - No, *you're* a hoax, nitwit! (n/t) - sunblockblock - 11/7/2002 6:28:32 PM
    - Hehe... must be a Democrat with no unit measure or maybe no scruples! n/t - €sunblok€ - 11/7/2002 7:10:28 PM
      - Up front and in your face Nathan, the ancient meanings of ocul-aris, P-aris, F-erris, and arris are? All the words to Imagine. - sunblok - 11/7/2002 12:14:21 PM
- Re: NASA to print book to confirm MOON LANDINGS...... - Jack Herer - 11/7/2002 5:59:56 PM
  - Re: No, they weren't . . . (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 11/7/2002 8:40:14 PM
- I have shaken the hands of men who went to the moon. - ebnelson - 11/7/2002 3:21:46 PM
  - I don't think it's about evidence... - McFly - 11/7/2002 4:49:42 PM
  - Re: I have shaken the hands of a man who went to the moon. - Raoul Lannoy - 11/7/2002 3:51:13 PM
- Re: NASA to print book to confirm MOON LANDINGS...... - Robert E. B. - 11/6/2002 8:17:37 PM
  - NASA to print book ... - robert_d - 11/6/2002 10:16:06 AM
- Re: 'how much evidence do they need?' - D. Spires - 11/6/2002 10:18:38 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (14 posts)