Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to Blah blah blah

Sums Up Your Recent Contributions Well

Again what you or anyone does elsewhere does not excuse distorting someone else's post. My reply to you on what I meant was sufficient. Your own post can be far easier misinterpreted than mine to give the false impression that Lee was not the sponsor of the hab idea since that is all I claimed and you imply my post was inaccurate. I explicitly stated I did not mean to imply he sponsored the greenhab and you should admit he did sponsor the hab program.

As for your own contributions one thing you most certainly have not done here is to contribute much signal. I thought you were on the team that built the first hab. If true you could contribute usefully by debunking some of the crap BD has spouted by something other than calling him names. That you choose to do what at best could be described as nit-picking and at worst gross-distortion says volumes about your misplaced priorities. The space advocacy community will never accomplish much when leaders such as yourself choose to fight over minor internal disagreements and details rather than counter disinformation spread by space-antagonists such as BD.

As far as I know you and I agree on most major issues and most policies. We even agree on many of the problems within the MS. I have tried to help in what small way I can to correct them, you chose to leave. I disagree strongly however, with the antagonistic attitude you take whenever someone disagrees with you like you are some sort of space-advocacy demi-god incapable of error. While there are few with your breadth of knowledge about the space program there are many with far more engineering training than you and more experience applying the principles of science and engineering in the real world.

Regards,
Mark

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (44 posts)