an excellent point.

et — 2/3/2003 9:53:51 AM (archived)

All motion is relative so that would work as well.

The only thing to worry about would be the RCS gas bursts disturbing the observer(AerCam or whatever).

The whole thread (20 posts)

tiles? future inspection - Brian Gyles - 2/3/2003 8:12:54 PM
- Re: Sure -- but it won't stop FOD . . . - D. Spires - 2/3/2003 8:36:06 PM
  - Re: Could've been hit by a meteorite - SM - 2/3/2003 8:57:52 PM
    - I think this has happened in the past... - Scott - 2/3/2003 9:39:18 AM
  - Re: Sure -- but it won't stop FOD . . . - Brian Gyles - 2/3/2003 9:00:39 AM
- Just about all missions in the same orbit as the station? - Scott - 2/3/2003 9:30:37 AM
  - Re: AerCam - Raoul Lannoy - 2/3/2003 9:42:17 AM
    - Wow! - Tom Brosz - 2/3/2003 11:40:54 AM
    - an excellent point. - et - 2/3/2003 9:53:51 AM
  - Re: If time and supplies allow . . . - D. Spires - 2/3/2003 9:33:53 AM
    - That would take an awful lot of fuel - Larry J - 2/3/2003 11:03:56 AM
      - Re: That would take an awful lot of fuel - Delbert - 2/3/2003 12:59:12 PM
        
        Not exactly - Splinx - 2/3/2003 1:17:42 PM
        
        Re: Not exactly - Delbert - 2/3/2003 3:54:27 PM
        
        Re: Not exactly - Splinx - 2/4/2003 6:04:16 PM
        
        True except that you have two factors in your favor on the way back vs. launch - Scott - 2/4/2003 4:09:45 PM
        
        Re: Not exactly - Larry J - 2/3/2003 1:48:42 PM
        
        Re: Not exactly - Splinx - 2/4/2003 6:07:02 PM
      - Re: Yes, it would . . . - D. Spires - 2/3/2003 11:44:19 AM
        
        I think it would be easer to redesign the heat sheilding. - Scott - 2/3/2003 12:56:16 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (20 posts)