Re: Peiser Is Often Incorrect In Many Areas
Agenda science.
In this case it may be self-aggrandizement.
But the results are the same. You cannot filter out the rhetoric from the results. And in agenda science the proponent leaves out data that conflicts with the desired/believed result. Now everyone has to do this to some extent. A conscientious researcher sincerely questions his own motives when saying that certain data pioints are inconsequential or the data source less than rigorous. Subconscious judgements have to be made. That's why the path to scientific discovery is so torturous and not straight line. And that's why a scientist can such a visionary pioneer on X while also being so dead wrong on Y.