"Interactive Graphic on the 2013 Budget" Source: New York Times. Sole editorial comment: "Useful."
"Dredging the Sediment of Government" Source: The Atlantic. Editorial comment: none
"Lottery Winner on Food stamps" Source: Daily Caller. Editorial comment: "Why not? She's not working."
"New from ABC TV" Source: ABC TV. Editorial comment: "Good Christian Bitches," the title of the show.
"Pink Slime, it’s good for you" Source: Huffington Post. Editorial comment: extensive, including title.
"The Growth of Government Dependence" Source: New York Times. Editorial comment: extensive.
“Hmmm” Source: general news. Editorial comment: something about Romney's luck in Virginia.
"Five Leadership Mistakes of the Galactic Empire" Source: Forbes. Editorial comment: none.
The definition of "trolling" used seems to be one I've seen many times on political boards (left and right), i.e. "busting in here with information we don't want to hear."
As Wes "Scoop" Nisker once said, "if you don't like the news, go out and make some of your own."
Current Events » in reply to "Because for better or worse, he’s our troll. "
"Trolling:"
The whole thread (36 posts)
- The growth of government dependence (edited)
- Re: The growth of government dependence (edited)
- Of course.
- Corrected for clarity.
- Re: Corrected for clarity.
- It was already clear who you meant.
- When I'm talking "Democrats" it's usually shorthand for the Democratic Party and its leaders and cronies. I'll try to watch that.
- I need to be clearer.
- Re: I need to be clearer.
- "Because for better or worse, he’s our troll. "
- I've ripped ER a dozen times for abusing the word "conspiracy." Don't you start.
- I need to be clearer.
- When I'm talking "Democrats" it's usually shorthand for the Democratic Party and its leaders and cronies. I'll try to watch that.
- Corrected for clarity.
- Re: The growth of government dependence (edited)
- Re: The growth of government dependence (edited)
- Re: The growth of government dependence (edited)