Re: Rough numbers

Space/Science » in reply to Rough numbers

Re: Rough numbers

Delbert — 5/14/2003 6:33:19 PM (archived)

Thanks Larry. Somehow I knew it would be you who would give it a try. It does seem less than I would have expected, but it was a rough kind of best case calculation. In reality it probably would take a considerably more than that. To load the Columbia with 73,000 KG of OMS propellant they would probably not have room for the payload.

The whole thread (12 posts)

Columbia question - Delbert - 5/13/2003 4:01:50 PM
- Rough numbers - Larry J - 5/14/2003 6:12:47 PM
  - Re: Rough numbers - Delbert - 5/14/2003 6:33:19 PM
    - Re: Rough numbers - Larry J - 5/14/2003 7:04:23 PM
- Re: Columbia question - Raoul - 5/14/2003 6:04:53 PM
- Re: Columbia question - Tom Brosz - 5/13/2003 5:07:26 PM
  - Re: Columbia question - Delbert - 5/13/2003 10:29:54 AM
  - Re:a good site, thanks, Tom (n/t) (n/t) - Raoul - 5/13/2003 9:26:38 AM
- Re: Columbia question - Gary - 5/13/2003 4:58:40 PM
  - Re: Columbia question - Delbert - 5/14/2003 3:46:26 PM
  - Not exactly accurate - Larry J - 5/14/2003 1:54:20 PM
- Re: Columbia question - Gary - 5/13/2003 4:56:36 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (12 posts)