Considering the fact that the government doesn't HAVE to fund it, it makes the problem in to something people aren't adressing correctly. . . its about taking money from people and using it for what some of them see as murder. Regardless of wether some agreee with those morals, I would ask is it really neccesary to make some people feel like involuntary manslaughterers when you don't have to? When private industry could do the job without the funds of these people who seriously view it as murder?

Basically, since the research is not imerative for the government to do, why do it at the cost of wht some think to be morrally wrong? its basically a respect for others. . . but I wonder if people would listen to such an arguement on those grounds.

-Justin Kelly