You're attacking a straw man.
Who alledged that he had done any unlawful activity? Non moi!
You gotta read what I said. Maybe I can't write clearly. For the 3rd time, the point is that we here have our own radical fundamentalist believers too but we here are free to reject them, or in your case, to embrace them. Read the past posts, that was the point I was trying to make.
As to religious litmus tests, that's an absolute. Me, I personally would NOT vote to confirm leftist ideologues or religious fundamentalist ideologues. I find that that kind of thinking can sometimes lead to dangerous behaviour and restrictions on individual liberty given power. The Hillary Clintons who "know what's right for me" are dangerous. That's my opinion.
-philw
Current Events » in reply to I think anyone who confuses thoughts with actions is much closer to Taliban than this nominee.
3rd time's the charm
