<Indidentally, If the missile detonated outside the 747, most of the shrapnel would not strike the plane, and most of the shrapnel that does strike the plane would probably be embedded in its exterior.

But fuel residue (clean and unburned, according to your posted story, which includes supposedly 'supporting' data from Sanders' tampered evidence cashe) survives to enter the craft and stain the seats.

I can't find it now (maybe you'll have better luck), but I seem to recall pathology reports which mentioned wounds on some of the deceased which were due to high-speed projectiles.

And I recall pointing out that when an aircraft strikes anything solid enough to stop it (i.e., water), everything within the craft becomes a killing bullet, with a speed nearly equivelent to the speed of imapact.

And then there is the case of the nose wheel doors and related nose-gear assemblies. There are several links related to this angle. Here's one and another.

And this has what to do with missile evidence?

There is also a PDF document in there on wing fragmentation which shows diagrams of Flt. 800's wings. I'm not sure I'm interpreting the images correctly, but it appears that the left or port wing has been riddled with something when compared to its starboard counterpart.

I see a wing that apparently took the brunt of the impact, compared with its mate, when colliding with the ocean.

None of the above sheds anything new on the crash, and none of it describes a missile impact. Where is the missile debris?

Dan
--ps--
ps. a toady is a sycophant or lacky - a boot licker.

Since you insisted on going to the trouble of defining the term, are you implying that you are a toady, or that you refuse to let the missile concept go -- or both?