The sad thing is, that most of these women claim to speak for 'all' women. That's the kind of thinking that needs to be changed, by those that read and have to sit and listen through those courses and whenever one speaks in general.

There's an underlying tone here that says: I'm a woman, speaking for your rights, I know what I'm talking about, if I was in power, things would be better... that's what they're telling me here. Sure, there are problems in every government, but to say that we have a global problem because of one country in particular doesn't do it now.

On the other hand, Ms. Sally Pipes did a good thing by writing this article.

Marcia
*I had to sit through one of those classes in college.

If they really want to help and 'study' something related to women, that is more current events related:

http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/01/17/airport.search.lawsuit/index.html

[Kaukab is seeking compensatory and punitive damages and wants the defendants to submit a plan to the court that will "ensure that discriminatory surveillance, stops, detentions, requests for consent to search and searches do not continue in the future." ]

I'm sorry for Ms. Kaukab, she should have been more thoughtfully searched by women, but searches should continue. As an American, she should understand that.

This one includes two women suspects:

http://europe.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/europe/01/18/inv.britain/index.html

All sexes are welcomed when it comes to terrorism, greed and tyranny.

---