That's very simple, a problem which has been solved many times.
Once the standards, values, or goals have been agreed upon then the community can figure out how to "decide" and enforce.
The United States has decided it's Constitution and Bill of Rights will be "decided" through a court system up to the Supreme Court. Earlier a jury decides, and the system then evaluates whether exact procedures have been followed.
I'm sure there are other ways to see that the letter and spirit are followed which ultimately apply the principles to a particular case fairly and in line with the goals.
In the military you admire so much the decisions are made by a superior officer in the rear. He factors into the decision his career, his own orders, his goals, and then passes on decisions which mean life or death to people. Unilaterally. That's one way which should meet with your approval.
Flame » in reply to All of these bong fantasies, including Carson's "Mutualism," fail in execution on one simple point: Who decides?
Re: All of these bong fantasies, including Carson's "Mutualism," fail in execution on one simple point: Who decides?
The whole thread (18 posts)
- More about corporate libertarianism.
- All of these bong fantasies, including Carson's "Mutualism," fail in execution on one simple point: Who decides?
- Re: All of these bong fantasies, including Carson's "Mutualism," fail in execution on one simple point: Who decides?
- Re: All of these bong fantasies, including Carson's "Mutualism," fail in execution on one simple point: Who decides?
- Re: All of these bong fantasies, including Carson's "Mutualism," fail in execution on one simple point: Who decides?
- I must have scored a hit. I see secondary explosions.
- Re: All of these bong fantasies, including Carson's "Mutualism," fail in execution on one simple point: Who decides?
- All of these bong fantasies, including Carson's "Mutualism," fail in execution on one simple point: Who decides?