Not true.

Current Events » in reply to Re: Nope!! But better than Ashcroft.

Not true.

Bowser — 5/9/2002 10:57:25 AM (archived)

The guy is trying to cram his Christian agenda down other folks. I can prove it.

Not trying to enforce the law and not trying to uphold the Constitution. He's trying to circumvent the Constitution of the US in order to force others to comply with his religious beliefs.

Offered to demonstrate this once, couldn't find people who said they would believe it even if I proved it. No sense casting pearls, etc., an old Christian saying.

Dangerous man. Sick man. I can see why he wants to cover up "Justice".

Arf

The whole thread (34 posts)

Massacre - p - 5/9/2002 7:39:42 PM
- Who trained the FARC? Castro. FARC is a tiny group that even when allowed to run for office - ebnelson - 5/9/2002 1:43:33 PM
- Some people never learn. - Bowser - 5/9/2002 10:08:10 AM
  - Not a Janet Reno fan, eh? (n/t) (n/t) - p - 5/9/2002 10:09:27 AM
    - Nope!! But better than Ashcroft. - Bowser - 5/9/2002 10:30:53 AM
      - Bowser, your sanctimonious ignorance is so entertaining. - ebnelson - 5/9/2002 1:44:52 PM
      - Ashcroft - Tom Brosz - 5/9/2002 11:06:22 AM
        
        You think I make this up? - Bowser - 5/9/2002 11:27:21 AM
        
        You sort of give yourself as away as a dimohack in this post, Dog boy. Ñ (n/t) - ebnelson - 5/9/2002 1:46:05 PM
        
        Re: In other words . . . - D. Spires - 5/9/2002 12:34:07 PM
      - Re: Nope!! But better than Ashcroft. - p - 5/9/2002 10:47:41 AM
        
        Not true. - Bowser - 5/9/2002 10:57:25 AM
        
        Yes, what you say is not true. - ebnelson - 5/9/2002 2:31:23 PM
        
        Re: If it's being crammed down my godless throat . . . - D. Spires - 5/9/2002 12:31:18 PM
        
        I'd like to see your proof - Larry J - 5/9/2002 12:22:36 PM
        
        He may have a hard time finding proof - FrankC - 5/9/2002 2:21:18 PM
        
        Proof - Tom Brosz - 5/9/2002 12:27:15 PM
        
        Not so fast, there, Kimosabe. - Bowser - 5/9/2002 1:27:42 PM
        
        Exactly what I said. - Tom Brosz - 5/9/2002 3:21:22 PM
        
        Exactly what I said. - Bowser - 5/9/2002 5:23:51 PM
        
        Re: Exactly what I said. - Tom Brosz - 5/10/2002 7:31:17 PM
        
        You tried, and failed this before. Have at it. - ebnelson - 5/9/2002 2:32:39 PM
        
        It's really quite simple - Larry J - 5/9/2002 2:07:06 PM
        
        Exactly what I said. - Bowser - 5/9/2002 5:25:24 PM
        
        Imagine this scenario - Larry J - 5/10/2002 1:20:05 PM
        
        Re: Much ado about nothing, Larry . . . - D. Spires - 5/10/2002 11:19:07 AM
        
        Now, Dan. - Bowser - 5/10/2002 12:36:24 PM
        
        Winner take all - Tom Brosz - 5/10/2002 3:57:43 PM
        
        Re: Now, Bowser . . . - D. Spires - 5/10/2002 2:29:45 PM
- It's front-page news at Washington Post, and MSNBC. - alcaray - 5/9/2002 9:01:21 AM
  - Re: It's front-page news at Washington Post, and MSNBC. - p - 5/9/2002 10:17:34 AM
    - I did miss your point, sorry. - alcaray - 5/9/2002 10:35:08 AM
      - Alcaray makes a good point - Tom Brosz - 5/9/2002 11:11:21 AM
      - Re: I did miss your point, sorry. - p - 5/9/2002 10:48:30 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (34 posts)