for Corky

Current Events » in reply to International Law

for Corky

p — 5/12/2002 12:32:21 PM (archived)

I'll spell it out simply for you. You took the counterposition to your actual position supporting the case for Intl Law and then cited extreme consequences bringing it to absurd lengths.
You really are a pretentious fella. A legend in your own mind, Corky.

-p

The whole thread (15 posts)

International Law & the Emperors Clothes - p - 5/11/2002 1:50:08 PM
- Re: International Law - Raoul - 5/11/2002 5:54:43 PM
  - International Law is only as good as those who write it - Matt Burley - 5/11/2002 9:50:50 AM
    - Subtract "International" from your subject line and apply it to any democratically-elected lawmaking body - Mary Anne - 5/12/2002 3:53:20 PM
      - Re: Subtract - Tom Brosz - 5/12/2002 6:46:40 PM
      - I respectfully disagree - Matt Burley - 5/12/2002 6:38:28 PM
        
        Do you think the excluded countries should be bound by the laws they had no part in making? n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 5/13/2002 7:45:09 PM
        
        Very well said! (n/t) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 5/12/2002 6:48:38 PM
        
        Re: International matters and others - Raoul - 5/12/2002 9:09:20 AM
        
        Yes, it's possible to invite a nations citizens but shun the government n/t (n/t) - Matt Burley - 5/12/2002 1:34:35 PM
- International Law - Bowser - 5/11/2002 5:18:44 PM
  - for Corky - p - 5/12/2002 12:32:21 PM
  - Re: International Law - p - 5/11/2002 5:21:29 PM
    - Latin, no less. - Bowser - 5/11/2002 8:07:10 AM
  - Re: International Law - Tom Brosz - 5/11/2002 8:00:42 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (15 posts)