They got their target didn't they?
Unless you are going to say that the Israelis went in there with the intention of killing civilians and just so happened to kill one of the leaders of Hamas Terrorists.
If I lived next door to the guy, I'd expect my building to get damaged or destroyed. I'd demand that he move. Or I'd move. I wouldn't put myself or my family anywhere near a walking target like that guy.
Or did the civilians in this building not have a clue as to who their neighbor was?
If you want to call it a "kill-em all" strategy, then go ahead...But I think if the intention was to "Kill-em all" then there would be a lot more than 10 or so civilian deaths. (And thats if you believe the Palestinian death toll figures).
Either way, its far from a war crime...No children were lined up against a wall and shot. There was no genocide. No gas chambers. No torture with battery cables.
I like to save the term "War Crime" for those instances that are truely "War Crimes" less we cheapen the definition and rule even heroic actions "War Crimes".
Scott (I guess we'll just have to disagree)
Current Events » in reply to Re: Scott . . .
Re: Scott . . .
The whole thread (18 posts)
- Palestinians Want Israel Indicted . . .
