Current Events » in reply to You read 'em?

The whole thread (22 posts)

• The war on terrorism - Raoul Lannoy - 7/29/2002 9:44:12 AM
  • understanding US - SDG - 7/30/2002 5:49:56 PM
    • Re: understanding US - Raoul - 7/30/2002 7:35:43 PM
  • Pardon me while I stifle my laugh. - SDAI-Tech1 - 7/30/2002 10:41:42 AM
  • Re: The war - Tom Brosz - 7/29/2002 4:19:00 PM
  • Re: good communication always helps, Raoul . . . - D. Spires - 7/29/2002 12:13:20 PM
  • Raoul, if the United States is seen as arrogant - Matt Burley - 7/29/2002 10:40:06 AM
    • Some concepts are beneath Americans. - Bowser - 7/29/2002 1:15:56 PM
      • It is nice to get back and see noting has changed, really. - ebnelson - 7/29/2002 4:25:15 PM
        • nothing has changed, really. - Tom Brosz - 7/29/2002 5:12:42 PM
          • You read 'em? - Bowser - 7/30/2002 3:08:35 PM
            • You are so very cute. § (n/t) - ebnelson - 7/30/2002 5:05:18 PM
              • What did he say? - SDAI-Tech1 - 7/30/2002 5:30:58 PM
                • Re: What did he say? - ebnelson - 7/30/2002 6:59:17 PM
        • No, he's not really a jerk. - Matt Burley - 7/29/2002 4:38:01 PM
      • Clueless, as usual... - Matt Burley - 7/29/2002 2:04:36 PM
        • Children. Aren't you wonderful! - Bowser - 7/29/2002 2:32:13 PM
          • You don't actually believe that stupid nonsense on that web site, do you?!? - Matt Burley - 7/29/2002 2:57:45 PM
            • The last in this thread, anyway. - Bowser - 7/29/2002 3:41:42 PM
              • No. It it is because many, many Afghans are treacherous ignoramuses and conspired to kill their own VP.. (n/t) (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 7/29/2002 5:25:52 PM
              • Actually the Afghan transitional government is protected by Afghans, Americans, and other allies - Matt Burley - 7/29/2002 4:29:35 PM
              • Bowser, you have never wasted - ebnelson - 7/29/2002 4:26:45 PM