Okay, another futile attempt to actually use reason:

Cheney got, what? $20 million +.



Bush got what? A bunch more than Torricelli, and not prosecuted. Heck, Bush has one of the Enron looters as Secretary of the Army.



Neither took money while in office to do something illegal. Cheney sold his stock in August of 2000. Selling stock before it goes down is not a crime in this country, unless inside info is involved. Does it occur to you that if either Bush or Cheney had any real dirt on them the Democrats and the New York Times would be on them like a duck on a June bug? Instead, we get abortive attempts to link Bush to Enron, and this feeble attempt on Cheney at the NYT. I will be posting on this article.

...How come Cheney has disappeared again? Just that he used Halliburton to screw the public isn't enough. Must be either sick or trying to pressure folks from coming up with more.

Cheney is, as believe I mentioned before, laying low for security reasons. Standard operating procedure--it's his goddam job description to be the Spare President. Do you have a short-term memory problem, or do you just need a whack with a rolled-up newspaper?