Re: Danger . . .

Current Events » in reply to Re: Deterrence

Re: Danger . . .

D. Spires — 10/14/2002 1:59:33 PM (archived)

Not worth the risk. Properly recovered material is much easier and safer to steal than loose contaminants.

Every Mom wants her martyr to amount to something memorable, and rotting away in a Pakistani hospital with massive leukemia because of sloppy nuke-handling ain't where the action is.

Dan

The whole thread (19 posts)

So now we have a decent resoluiton on Iraq. What is next? - ebnelson - 10/13/2002 8:06:03 AM
- Re: Deterrence - Raoul - 10/13/2002 9:11:45 AM
  - Just read an article about Fidel Castro - Scott - 10/14/2002 3:14:53 PM
  - Re: Deterrence - Tom Brosz - 10/13/2002 1:08:20 PM
    - Re: Deterrence - Raoul - 10/13/2002 5:45:32 PM
      - Re: Danger . . . - D. Spires - 10/14/2002 1:59:33 PM
      - Re: Deterrence - gbaikie - 10/14/2002 8:46:21 AM
        
        Re: Deterrence - Raoul - 10/14/2002 4:08:28 PM
        
        And how do you know this? - Larry J - 10/14/2002 6:49:19 PM
        
        Re: And how do you know this? - Raoul - 10/14/2002 9:14:27 AM
        
        Re: And how do you know this? - Larry J - 10/14/2002 9:59:13 AM
        
        Don't forget... - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/14/2002 1:08:31 PM
        
        Re: Don't forget... - Raoul - 10/14/2002 4:18:28 PM
        
        Good immigrants vs. bad ones - Tom Brosz - 10/14/2002 4:54:26 PM
        
        more likely Europe will become a Socialist police state - Scott - 10/14/2002 4:59:01 PM
        
        Re: Socialist police state - Raoul - 10/14/2002 9:22:20 AM
        
        Re: Socialist police state - Tom Brosz - 10/14/2002 10:05:54 AM
        
        Oh...You just had to bring up that vacation thing didn't you... - Scott - 10/14/2002 9:45:17 AM
        
        Re: earning... - Raoul Lannoy - 10/14/2002 9:48:32 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (19 posts)