Current Events » in reply to We backed out as provided in the treaty

The whole thread (22 posts)

• Another part of the empty clinton legacy collapses - ebnelson - 10/16/2002 1:16:10 PM
  • Yeah. Reneging on an international arms control treaty! - Tony - 10/17/2002 1:36:13 PM
    • Article XV - Larry J - 10/17/2002 1:58:41 PM
    • We backed out as provided in the treaty - ebnelson - 10/17/2002 1:41:25 PM
      • Facts only trouble me when I dont remember 'em (n/t) (n/t) - Tony - 10/17/2002 2:06:36 PM
  • Why do nations make agreements with totalitarian/communist states? - Gary - 10/16/2002 5:47:35 PM
    • Some treaties with these states have been beneficial - alcaray - 10/17/2002 4:37:20 PM
      • So in otherwords, this treaty was beneficial to Clinton - Scott - 10/17/2002 5:38:09 PM
        • Gary and I were talking about the biowar treaty with the Soviets n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 10/17/2002 10:55:05 AM
    • Yup! - Mary Anne - 10/17/2002 12:13:04 PM
      • the Saudis - McFly - 10/17/2002 1:43:51 PM
      • I think NK is the clear and present danger. - ebnelson - 10/17/2002 12:28:56 PM
  • From a website gushing with nauseating praise of Jimmy Carter and his Nobel Prize - Matt Burley - 10/16/2002 3:04:05 PM
    • Re: Incarnating America - Raoul - 10/16/2002 5:50:03 PM
    • "Nauseating" praise for Jimmy Carter - Gary - 10/16/2002 5:37:29 PM
      • I'd give Carter a D- - Buck Galaxy - 10/17/2002 3:34:57 PM
        • I'd grade him somewhat higher - Larry J - 10/17/2002 4:05:32 PM
      • Shady deals derailed Carter's attempts to free hostages - Splinx - 10/16/2002 5:55:28 PM
        • You conspiracy whackos are amazing - ebnelson - 10/17/2002 12:33:34 PM
          • It was still a shady deal, probably treasonous - Splinx - 10/17/2002 1:59:16 PM
            • shady deal - Tom Brosz - 10/17/2002 1:24:38 PM
  • Guess they'll just have to take a number. (n/t) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/16/2002 2:10:12 PM