You seen to believe that if someone reads you they have to agree. Or there's a communication problem.
Your questions are not all that reasonable. For instance, there are many, many cases of holocausts in very recent times where there are people killing their own people (Rwanda) by the millions.
The US does nothing. (Why not? Hint - how much oil in Rwanda.)
What would have happened if US invaded Soviet Union before it had nukes? After all, the Germans wanted to surrender to the Allies and continue the war against the USSR.
Well, we'd have gotten our butts kicked, hard. Just as they would if they tried to invade us. The lost 20 million people in WWII, and would have been delighted to lose 40 million more for the cause. (A lesson we could have used to stay the hell out of Vietnam, and had 58,000 more taxpayers now.)
Nope. Reading doesn't mean agreeing with the premise(s).
Arf
Current Events » in reply to Would appreciate more input from anyone who actually read my post (n/t)
"Read" does NOT mean "agree with" to most people.
The whole thread (27 posts)
- Andrew Sullivan on North Korea