Current Events » in reply to Then you care to explain why the US has 40,000 troops in South Korea?

The whole thread (14 posts)

• Do you think the carriers are headed for Iraq or N. Korea or both? - Scott - 12/27/2002 11:38:28 AM
  • N. Korea doesn't have oil waiting to be pumped. n/t (n/t) - Bowser - 12/27/2002 12:56:47 PM
    • Then you care to explain why the US has 40,000 troops in South Korea? - Matt Burley - 12/27/2002 1:21:20 PM
      • You forget whom you are trying to discuss something with. - ebnelson - 12/28/2002 3:12:55 PM
      • Duh! A deterrence. Sorry. - Bowser - 12/27/2002 1:33:37 PM
        • so exactly who is holding me hostage? - Justin Kelly - 12/27/2002 7:12:23 PM
          • Why do you think you're there? - Bowser - 12/29/2002 7:24:08 PM
            • Which is why the PulYoungYangs won't attack Soeul you MohrRon... - Scott - 12/30/2002 4:55:57 PM
            • Answer my question - Justin Kelly - 12/29/2002 10:20:16 AM
        • You're even stupider than I thought - Matt Burley - 12/27/2002 3:44:18 PM
        • Truman's Korean legacy...darn that Strom keeps looking better! (n/t) (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/27/2002 2:57:16 PM
          • Eisenhower. - Bowser - 12/28/2002 8:04:32 PM
            • Deep Maroon or Burgundy? - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/29/2002 2:10:00 PM
    • That's right! We're just planning on using them as slave labor. (n/t) (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/27/2002 1:18:27 PM