When did we assume the role of telling peoples who they could be ruled by, how, when and where and in what manner? Worse, when did we decide that it was okay to kill a people to liberate them when there has been no expression of their desire to be liberated by us? Indeed, how did we fall in to using this word, 'liberation' in this context.

We are not wanted there. Yes, Saddam is a brutal bastard. Yes, The Iraqi people hate him and what he has done to Iraq... But they don't want us there. How can we claim that we are doing them a favor?

Are we just to believe that we/The Administration is just simply unquestionably right?

The America I love led by example, rallied the people in oppressed lands to hope. Opened their eyes that no dictator can really ever block the will of the people- they will ALWAYS fail when the people are resolved (you DO remember Ghandi and MLK, and H.D.Theurreu[sp?] Right?)

When did we start shooting people to free them?

Is our only justification in doing this that we are the "~Saddams" and therefore are right in every death we make?

This is so unimaginably arrogant. This is so conceited.

"Be freed by us and accept our choice for your destiny, or be killed by us."

Davin L.