Current Events » in reply to Re: You give no details about what the protestors statement was

The whole thread (18 posts)

• Bogus Protests - Perspective - 4/10/2003 6:21:49 PM
  • Arithmetic is not my strong point - Mary Anne - 4/10/2003 7:05:53 PM
    • Re: Arithmetic is not my strong point - Perspective - 4/10/2003 8:48:14 AM
      • One point I agree with: Pork spending is definitely a bi-partisan hobby. (n/t) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 4/10/2003 9:57:50 AM
      • Actually, no I didn't, but I did ignore it - Mary Anne - 4/10/2003 9:27:51 AM
  • Re: Bogus Protests - Tom Brosz - 4/10/2003 7:05:38 PM
    • Re: Bogus Protests - Davin L. - 4/10/2003 7:13:49 PM
      • No jigging...you won that one fair and square. - Tom Brosz - 4/10/2003 7:25:30 PM
        • Re: No jigging...you won that one fair and square. - gbaikie - 4/10/2003 8:10:41 AM
          • Re: No jigging...you won that one fair and square. - p - 4/10/2003 8:20:50 AM
            • Every nickel in the budget has friends... - Tom Brosz - 4/10/2003 10:00:28 AM
              • Irrelevant...I mentioned well documented cost SAVING$ n/t (n/t) - p - 4/11/2003 12:32:38 PM
  • You give no details about what the protestors statement was - alcaray - 4/10/2003 10:50:29 AM
    • Re: You give no details about what the protestors statement was - Perspective - 4/11/2003 3:49:24 PM
      • You have a funny way of unwinding... - Mary Anne - 4/11/2003 5:08:05 PM
        • LOL - Perspective - 4/11/2003 7:17:33 PM
      • Re: "Their statement was that this lawmaker had voted to cut veterans' benefits. Period." - alcaray - 4/11/2003 4:20:37 PM
        • Good Question - Perspective - 4/11/2003 5:04:37 PM