Can you say EMBARGO?

Current Events » in reply to Not accurate

FrankC — 4/12/2003 4:49:12 PM (archived)

Not trying to be cute but unless I am mistaken there was a UN imposed embargo on military goods of any kind.

The power of the UN to impose or enforce such, is as always, questionable.

The whole thread (19 posts)

Not so Dumbsfeld - Buck Galaxy - 4/11/2003 3:32:02 PM
- Sanctions Did Not Work. Massive Ammo Depots All Over Iraq - Mark Eby - 4/11/2003 4:16:44 PM
  - Not banned weapons - Don - 4/11/2003 4:36:29 PM
    - Supplying Any Weapons Was A NoNo - Mark Eby - 4/12/2003 3:46:49 PM
      - Not accurate - Don - 4/12/2003 4:03:54 PM
        
        Can you say EMBARGO? - FrankC - 4/12/2003 4:49:12 PM
        
        So much for the "let sanctions work" argument - Larry J - 4/13/2003 10:04:19 AM
        
        Serbia violates embargo - FrankC - 4/12/2003 4:56:12 PM
        
        Re: Not accurate - gbaikie - 4/12/2003 4:42:18 PM
    - Re: Not banned weapons - gbaikie - 4/11/2003 4:57:38 PM
- It goes witout saying - Don - 4/11/2003 4:15:06 PM
  - Re: It goes witout saying - ebnelson - 4/11/2003 4:31:41 PM
    - Not at all - Don - 4/11/2003 4:41:03 PM
      - Amazing how fast we went from "quagmire" to "Saddam is a weenie." (n/t) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 4/11/2003 5:04:30 PM
        
        I remeber Bowser saying months ago it would be a slaughter of the Iraqi army n/t (n/t) - LJ - 4/12/2003 5:27:35 PM
        
        Excuse me Tom, but... - Don - 4/12/2003 1:17:09 PM
      - Saddam seemed to survive the 1998 strategy just fine. § (n/t) - ebnelson - 4/11/2003 4:49:31 PM
- On strategy - FrankC - 4/11/2003 3:45:22 PM
- Re: Not so Dumbsfeld - ebnelson - 4/11/2003 3:43:30 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (19 posts)