Well Said
Bennett is a simple re-hash of Thomas Aquinas at times. I have never been impressed with him after I listen more than topically to anything he says.
More often then not, he uses Tom Tactic #3: Argue off unstated and unsupported premises, and when challenged, use the line: "You would have to be a foool to believe [proposition NOT(X)], therefore X"... Make sure that NOT(X) is a strawman to make it effective...
Bennett is bright and articulate, I will give him that... but he is very un-moving... 'specially with all those recycled-catholic-church-circa-scholastic-period arguments....
Davin L.